https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2019.06.007
doi.org
The verse referenced (Surah Al-Jumu'ah 62:5) presents a powerful metaphor: carrying valuable knowledge without understanding, absorbing, or implementing it is equivalent to a pack animal bearing a burden of books.
When examined alongside modern comparative cognition literature, this metaphor becomes even more striking. Far from portraying the animal as inherently "dumb," scientific research highlights a profound contrast between a donkey's cognitive capabilities and its physical role as a passive carrier.
Key Parallels in Cognitive Literature
- Capacity vs. Access (Physical Carrying vs. Internalization):
A beast of burden experiences books merely as weight, volume, and balance constraints. Modern animal behavior research shows that while donkeys possess advanced cognitive processes—such as complex spatial mapping, long-term memory, and problem-solving—a physical load places mechanical stress on the animal without granting it access to the information within the cargo (Navas González et al., 2019). The metaphor hinges on this strict isolation: proximity to knowledge does not equal comprehension.
- Long-Term Memory and Environmental Awareness:
Ethological studies demonstrate that donkeys (Equus asinus) exhibit strong long-term memory and high situational awareness. They retain spatial layouts, recognize individuals across years, and evaluate potential dangers rather than reacting on pure instinct. The allegory relies on this subtle contrast: the animal is fully capable of processing environmental cues to navigate real-world hazards, yet the written manuscripts on its back remain completely opaque to it.
- Functional Utility vs. Transformative Understanding:
In cognitive science, information must be processed, categorized, and applied to alter behavior or decision-making. The allegorical donkey transfers the text physically from point A to point B without any internal transformation. Similarly, the theological warning targets individuals who possess, cite, or transport sacred scriptures but fail to let those teachings guide their ethics, character, or actions.
Summary
The scientific literature underscores that carrying a load requires physical effort, whereas understanding information requires cognitive engagement. The metaphor highlights the absurdity of possessing transformative wisdom while remaining entirely unchanged by it—treating profound truth as nothing more than extra weight.
References
Navas González, F. J., Jordana Vidal, J., León Jurado, J. M., McLean, A. K., & Delgado Bermejo, J. V. (2019). Dumb or smart asses? Donkey's (Equus asinus) cognitive capabilities share the heritability and variation patterns of human's (Homo sapiens) cognitive capabilities. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 33, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2019.06.007
Cited by: 34